Info

250 - Phantom-Goldbeard's Strike Force (15th Mar.1976)



 It's reprinted version of Charlton #66.


Download NEW C2C scans(2000px width)- 53 Mb
                                 


12 comments:

  1. "
    Script: Lee Falk 

    Artist: Seymour Barry ,Fred Fredericks ,Dan Barry "-------------------------------
    None of the above credits is correct as this one is from Charlton (No. 66).

    Thanks for posting this High Resolution version.

    TPh

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi,

    here are data for the original Charlton:

    The Phantom
    Volume 8
    Issue 66
    1975-08
    25¢
    The All New Phantom
    Charlton Comics

    Table Of Contents
    01.    Front Cover (by Don Sherwood)
    02.    Advertising
    03.    The Phantom: Goldbeard the Pirate
        Editor: George Wildman
        Writer and Illustrator: Joe Gill / Don Sherwood (?)
            D-6777

    and for the original Indrajal:

    Indrajal Comics 250
    1976-03-15
    The Phantom
    Goldbeard‘s Strike Force
    Rs. 1.00
    A Times Of India Publication
    IJC front cover art: n/a

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks a lot for this IJC. Also thanks to Emile Schwarz to provide detailed basic informations.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Cover art - Govind Brahmania, the legendary cover artist of Indrajal Comics.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @TPH & @Emile Schwarz : Actually due to shortage of time I had requested MiSD for posting himself, then he started posting. He was worrying about the details. I promised to add/correct details. Since last several weeks I'm very busy, can't post & check regularly as earlier. That's why you had noticed about details.
    Pls don't mind.
    IJCs are online due to collective efforts. Information provided by you is most appreciated.
    Thanks for support & understanding!

    ReplyDelete
  6.  Thanks brother I will leave blank in next post you fill the details yourself but I don't understand why people more interested in the details of the comic instead of downloading it

    ReplyDelete
  7. oh dear, for most readers, details are always secondary to comic. the main effort is in scanning and sharing, no two views about it. but hardcore phans do like to gather all the related information to their favourite comics, it is great fun in itself.

    this plateform is fast becoming the definitive source of indrajals. sooner or later all 803 published indrajals shall be here in high resolution, that too in multiple languages. my humble request is if any author or artist related information has to be given along with the comic, it should be absolutely correct and checked. won't it be better not to supply any data rather than giving wrong data? please consider, and do not take it otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you MiSd & Prabhat!

    ReplyDelete
  9. venkitachalam subramanian22 April 2012 at 01:33

    I am really surprised at your comment about people being interested in details. Have you seen the database with Emile, even regarding IJCs though he is not even Indian? People like Emile (TPH & I) are interested in the details also along with the comic. Better to leave those details blank rather than give wrong details, even unknowingly.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Venkit you write on my blog that you should thankful to the original scanner Now I ask you that are you thankful to my scans? I don't think you are, because you only criticize  my mistakes instead of giving thanks to me. I don't want any thanks and credits from anyone but I  want to relies to you that think  before writing a comment. I don't post my scans for the credits but only want to share my collection of Indrajal comics  to others because I didn't found good scans of Indrajal  on any blog that's why  I start scanning. And I already mentioned to PBC That in next post I leave those details blank. then why you suggesting me again what is the problem with you?

    ReplyDelete
  11. venkitachalam subramanian22 April 2012 at 23:43

    I do not want to turn this into a he-said he-said sort of a feud. I have none against you any one else. But I would like to answer some of what u claim I did.

    01.Your words "Venkit you write on my blog that you should thankful to the original scanner Now I ask you that are you thankful to my scans? I don't think you are, because you only criticize  my mistakes instead of giving thanks to me. I don't want any thanks and credits from anyone but I  want to relies to you that think  before writing a comment."
        I stand by my words. If you post something that you have not spent even a millisecond of your time scanning or editing, I strongly feel that you have to say truthfully that you are indebted to so-and-so for the scans. If you do not know the details of the original scanner, you should at least acknowledge your gratitude to the unknown scanner and not create the false impression that you did the hard work.
        As regards not expressing my thanks to your scans, please refer to the post in this same blog.
     http://indrajal-online.blogspot.com/2011/11/200-1974-ratmen-of-rodencia-219-1974.html.
        Just because you post so many things, it does not mean that I have to download them all and say thanks. The simple reason being, those comics do not interest me. It has always been my policy to put in a word of thanks as soon as I download anything that interests me.

    02. Your words " I don't post my scans for the credits but only want to share my collection of Indrajal comics  to others because I didn't found good scans of Indrajal  on any blog that's why  I start scanning."
          These words just like "I don't understand why people more interested in the details of the comic instead of downloading it" in your previous note is a sweeping condemnation of whoever that does not think the same way you do.
         People have been scanning IJCs for the sake of sharing, right from 2005. In this blog itself we have been able to put up nearly 400-500 comics in HQ since 2008. There are a lot of other bloggers who have been posting HQ scans in their blogs. So your assertion that you didn't find good scans of IJC on any blog, is either disingenuous or childish.

    03. I have no feud with you or any other person. There may be differences of opinion and I think we should be mature to discuss those in a grown up manner. I am stopping any further comments in the matter irrespective of what kind of immature reaction is there to this note. 

    Thanks for all of your original posts that I have downloaded.

    ReplyDelete
  12.  It's your blog's rule that you give credit to every scanner and give details of every comic but you cannot see any  details of any comics or credits on my blog and I did not put my MiSD signature on any others scan I did't want any other person's credit I regard them and  I know how hard it is to scan a comic  so please don't discus this matter further

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.